Articles Blog

Chris Wallace: Mueller’s Testimony Was A Disaster

Chris Wallace: Mueller’s Testimony Was A Disaster


THANK YOU FOR STICKING
WITH US. FOLKS, MY FIRST GUEST HAS BEEN
REPORTING FOR 50 YEARS, CONTINUING A FAMILY TRADITION OF
GREAT JOURNALISM. HE ANCHORS “FOX NEWS SUNDAY,”
AND IS NOW PROMOTING A NEW DOCUMENTARY ABOUT HIS FATHER,
“MIKE WALLACE IS HERE.”>>WHAT ABOUT THIS STATEMENT
THAT YOU MADE IN YOUR OWN PAPER?>>YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO SIT IN
JUDGMENT ON ME.>>I’M NOT SITTING IN JUDGMENT. I’M SIMPLY ASKING A QUESTION. WE WERE DOING THINGS AT THE TIME
THAT WERE REVOLUTIONARY, I MEAN, ASKING SERIOUS QUESTIONS, ASKING
ABRASIVE QUESTION.>>I’M READY ANY TIME YOU WANT
TO REPEAT THE STUPID QUESTION.>>WE GOT INTO A FLOCK OF
LAWSUITS AND IT JUST BECAME TOO CONTROVERSIAL.>>THIS HAS BEEN THE LAST
PROGRAM. AS TONIGHT’S GUEST, BEFORE WE
CAN TELL THE WORLD WHO WE ARE AND BEFORE WE CAN ACT FOR THE
FUTURE, OURSELVES MUST KNOW WHO WE ARE, WHAT WE STAND FOR, AND
WHAT WE MEAN BY “FREEDOM.” MIKE WALLACE. GOOD NIGHT.>>Stephen: PLEASE WELCOME CHRIS
WALLACE! ( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE )
♪ ♪ ♪ ( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE )
♪ ♪ ♪>>Stephen: THANKS FOR COMING
BACK. NICE TO SEE YOU AGAIN. I REALLY ENJOYED OUR LAST
CONVERSATION TOGETHER. I’M SO GLAD YOU CAME BACK.>>I’M GLAD ONE OF US DID. BUT I CAN– CAN YOU IMAGINE, YOU
JUST SAW THAT CLIP, YOU CAN IMAGINE HAVING MIKE WALLACE AS A
FATHER. YOU’RE A TEENAGER AND YOU GO OUT
ON A DATE AND YOU COME HOME, AND MIKE WALLACE IS SITTING THERE
WAITING TO ASK YOU QUESTIONS. “WHAT DID YOU DO? HOW LONG WERE YOU OUT? HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THIS HIDDEN
CAMERA VIDEO?” ( LAUGHTER )
I MEAN –>>Stephen: CAN YOU EXPLAIN
THE LIPSTICK ON YOUR COLACHRIS?>>UNFORTUNATELY, THERE WASN’T
MUCH LIPSTICK ON MY COLLAR. HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THE LACK OF
LIPSTICK ON YOUR COLLAR? I HAVE TO SAY SOMEONE ONCE SAID
ABOUT MY FATHER THAT HE HAD AN UNDERDEVELOPED SENSE OF OTHER
PEOPLE’S PRIVACY, WHICH MADE HUM A GREAT JOURNALIST.>>Stephen: SURE.>>A GREAT INTERVIEWER, AND A
PAIN IN THE ASS AS A FATHER ( LAUGHTER ).>>Stephen: I WANT TO GET INTO
MORE OF THAT. I WAS LUCKY ENOUGH TO INTERVIEW
YOUR FATHER ONCE.>>YOU KNOW YOU DID GLI REALLY
ENJOWD THAT. BUT BEFORE WE GET TO THE
DOCUMENTARY, “MIKE WALLACE IS HERE,” I WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE
HEARING TODAY. I KNOW YOU WERE ON THE AIR TODAY
WITH FOX NEWS GIVING YOUR OWN ANALYSIS AND THE PRESIDENT KNEW
THAT ALSO.>>YES.>>Stephen: BECAUSE AT– AT–
AT 10:11 THIS MORNING, HE TWEETED THIS STATEMENT THAT YOU
HAD MADE. “THIS HAS BEEN A DISASTER FOR
THE DEMOCRATS AND A DISASTER FOR THE REPUTATION OF ROBERT
MUELLER.” NOW, YOU SAID THAT AT 10:07 THIS
MORNING, AN HOUR AND A HALF INTO A SIX-HOUR SERIES OF HEARINGS. SO IS FOX NEWS’ MOTTO, “WE
REPORT AND DECIDE BEFORE THE THING’S OVER?”
>>THERE WAS A BREAK IN THE HEARING. WE WERE ASKED FOR OUR REACTION. AND LET ME SIMPLY SAY, NOTHING
IN YOUR MONOLOGUE DISPROVED THAT DESCRIPTION.>>Stephen: IN WHAT WAY WAS IT
A DISASTER? I DON’T UNDERSTAND.>>YES, YOU DO.>>Stephen: MOW, I PROMISE
YOU, YOU DON’T. IT SEEMED LUKE A WELL-ORGANIZED
AND CHOREOGRAPHED RECITATION OF THE MORAL, ETHICAL AND CRIMINAL
FAILINGS OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. NOW, INTERJECTED, INTERJECTED
BETWEEN THOSE– CHEAPER BETWEEN THOSE YOU HAD REPUBLICANS
UNDERMINING– ATTEMPTING TO UNDERMINE THE CREDIBILITY OF THE
MAN AND THE MISSION, WHICH WAS THE REPORT. BUT OF COURSE YOU’RE GOING TO
EXPECT THAT. YOU KIND OF KNEW THE WAY ROBERT
MUELLER WAS GOG ANSWER, AND YOU KNEW THE WAY THE REPUBLICANS
WERE GOING TO ATTACK HIM.>>LISTEN —
>>Stephen: BUT IT DISAPPOINT TAKE AWAY THE IMPACT OF THE
FACTUAL STATEMENTS FROM THE REPORT.>>BUT WE HEARD THE FACTUAL
STATEMENTS FROM THE REPORT BACK IN MARCH WHEN THE REPORT WAS
RELEASED. LAURENCE TRIBE, WHO IS A
DISTINGUISHED HARVARD LAW PROFESSOR AND A FIERCE CRITIC OF
DONALD TRUMP SAID, ALSO– I MUST SAY, IT WAS AFTER I SAID IT–
THAT THE HEARING WAS A DISASTER, AND INSTEAD OF BREATHING LIFE
INTO THE REPORT, HE SUCKED THE LIFE OUT OF THE REPORT. I MEAN, THE REPORT STANDS, AND
I’M NOT SAYING– YOU KNOW, THE REPORT IS WHAT THE REPORT IS,
AND IT RAISES SOME VERY TROUBLING QUESTION ABOUT THE
PRESIDENT’S BEHAVIOR. BUT THE WHOLE REASON THAT THE
DEMOCRATS, THE HOUSE MAJORITY, THE DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY IN THE
HOUSE, WANTED TO HAVE THIS HEARING IS, THEY KEPT SAY– THE
QUOTE WAS, “PEOPLE AREN’T GOING TO READ THE BOOK. THEY’LL WATCH THE MOVIE.” THE MOVIE WAS A SNORE. AND PART OF IT WAS, FRANKLY, WAS
BECAUSE ROBERT MUELLER WAS– SEEMED NOT IN CONTROL OF HIS
BRIEF. HE DIDN’T SEEM IN CHARGE. I THINK IT RAISED QUESTIONS AS
TO HOW MUCH HE ACTUALLY RAN THE INVESTIGATION. AND AS YOU SHOWED IN SOME OF
YOUR CLIPS, I MEAN, YOU WERE MAKING LIGHT OF IT, BUT IT WAS
ACTUALLY KIND OF –>>Stephen: I’M SORRY I MADE
LIGHT. I’M SORRY I MADE LIGHT.>>YOU DIDN’T MAKE THAT MUCH
LIGHT OF IT SO YOU’RE OKAY. I– I THOUGHT THAT IT WAS SAD,
ACTUALLY. I THOUGHT– YOU KNOW, BECAUSE
HE’S A VERY DISTINGUISHED MAN.>>Stephen: SURE.>>HE HAS HAY GREAT CAREER IN
LAW ENFORCEMENT, AND AT LEAST ON THE BASIS OF TODAY, HE SEEMED
LUKE A FELLOW WHO WASN’T– DIDN’T QUITE KNOW WHAT HE WAS
ABOUT, WHAT WAS BEING SAID. HE HAD TROUBLE FINDING THE
VARIOUS CONGRESSMEN, WHERE THEY WERE ON THE PODIUM, LET ALONE
ANSWERING THEIR QUESTIONS.>>Stephen: HAVE YOU EVER
TESTIFIED BEFORE A CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE?>>NO.>>Stephen: I HAVE. I HAVE. AND THAT’S JUST THE MECHANICS OF
YOU. YOU DON’T KNOW WHO IS SPEAKING
TO YOU BECAUSE YOU’RE HEARING A SPEAKER, NOT THEIR FACES. THESE ARE ALL PERFORMANCE NOTES
YOU’RE GIVING.>>YIT IS.>>Stephen: AND THEY ONLY MEAN
SOMETHING BECAUSE WE’VE BEEN– WE’VE BECOME DESENSITIZED TO THE
SHOCK OF THE INFORMATION THAT THEY WERE LAYING OUT FOR US. THAT IN SOME WAYS HAS NOTHING TO
DO WITH THE INFORMATION. THAT’S– IT’S LIKE THE DANCE OF
IT, AS OPPOSED TO WHAT THE ACTUAL IMPORT OF THE INFORMATION
WAS.>>BUT ALL OF THAT WAS IN THE
REPORT. ( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE )
LOOK –>>Stephen: THEY’RE RIGHT.>>LOOK.>>Stephen: I’LL LET– I’LL
LET YOU– I’LL LET YOU FINISH WHEN I DO. ( LAUGHTER )
THAT IS THAAD JUST PROVES MY POINT THAT– DO YOU THINK THAT
THE THUNGZ THAT WERE SAID, THE ENUM RAILTED MORAL AND ETHICAL
AND CRIMINAL FAILINGS OF THE PRESIDENT AS DESCRIBED IN THOSE
TWO REPORTS, PART ONE AND PART TWO, DO YOU THINK THEY’RE
SHOCKING IN ANY WAY?>>OF COURSE,.>>Stephen: DO YOU THINK
PEOPLE–>>BUT I DON’T THINK THEY’RE
MORE SHOCKING TODAY THAN THEY WERE WHEN THE REPORT WAS
RELEASED IN MARCH.>>Stephen: THEY HADN’T BEEN
LAID OUT SO SUCCINCTLY WITH THE MAN RIGHT THERE.>>LOOK, WE ALL TALK ABOUT OUR
POLITICS BEING TOO TRIBAL, RIGHT?>>Stephen: I’M NOT SURE I
SAY, THAT BUT GO AHEAD.>>YOU PROBABLY DON’T BECAUSE
YOU’RE PART OF A TRIBE AND THIS IS THE ANTI-TRUMP TRIBE. AND YOU REPRESENT THE ANTI-TRUMP
TRIBE, AND SO DO A LOT OF PEOPLE IN THIS AUDIENCE. THERE’S A PRO-TRUMP TRIBE. ( APPLAUSE )
OKAY, AND THERE’S NOT WRONG WITH BEING IN ONE —
>>Stephen: ( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE )
OOUM IN THE DO NOT– I’M IN THE “DO NOT WELCOME THE HELP OF A
FOREIGN COUNTRY TO WIN OUR ELECTION” TRIBE. THOSE ARE MY TRIBES. ( CHEERS AND APPLAUSE )
WHAT TRIBE– WHAT TRIBE ARE YOU IN? IF WE’RE TALKING TRIBES, I’D
LIKE TON WHAT TRIBE YOU’RE IN WHEN IT COMES TO THOSE TWO
THINGS?>>I’M IN THE JOURNALIST TRIBE
WHICH ISIT ISING THERE CALLING THE SHOTS, EACH PITCH, THAT
COMES IN– IS THAT A BALL? IS IT A STRIKE. LET ME FINISH.>>Stephen: AND IT SEEMS OLD. IS THAT A STRIKE?>>AND JUST AS ON SUNDAY, IF YOU
WATCHED MY SHOW, YOU SAW ME –>>Stephen: I DON’T WATCH YOUR
SHOW.>>I DON’T STAY UP AND WATCH
YOUR SHOW, EITHER.>>Stephen: I HAVE TO WATCH
CBS. LEGAL ME I’M NOT ALLOWED TO WAP
FOX. YOU SEEM NICE, BUT LEGALLY–
>>IN ANY CASE, JUST AS– YOU KNOW, I THINK THAT IF– I JUST
FELT THAT IT WAS– I’M CALLING BALLS AND STRIKES, AND JUST AS
ON SUNDAY WHEN STEPHEN MILLER OFFICE OUR SHOW, AND I TALKED
ABOUT THE FACT THAT I THOUGHT THAT THE PRESIDENT WAS STOKING
RACIAL DIVISIONS, AND I BELIEVE HE IS. I WATCHED TODAY, AND I HAVE TO
COME OUT– AND YOU SAY, “WELL, THESE ARE PERFORMANCE, THEATER,
CRITIC NOTES.”>>Stephen: YES.>>THE FACT IS, THAT’S WHAT THIS
IS ALL ABOUT. IF YOU ALL YOU CARED ABOUT WAS
THE REPORT, THE REPORT WAS THERE IN BLACK AND WHITE TWO MONTHS
AGO. THE WHOLE REASON THAT THEY HAD
THE HEARING WAS TO BREATHE LIFE INTO THE REPORT. THAT’S WHAT JERRY NADLER, THE
CHAIRMAN, SAID. THEY DIDN’T BREATHE LIFE INTO
THE REPORT TODAY.>>Stephen: WE HAVE TO TALK A
BREAK RIGHT NOW, BUT WE’LL BE RIGHT BACK TO TALK WITH CHRIS
WALLACE AND MORE ABOUT THE NEW DOCUMENTARY ABOUT HUSBAND
FATHER, MIKE WALLACE. STICK AROUND.

100 thoughts on “Chris Wallace: Mueller’s Testimony Was A Disaster”

  1. @
    Jun 3, 2019 – Sanders no longer favors government takeover of "the major means of production." But his four-decade quest for political revolution continues.

  2. Yea, there are so many "crimes" in the report that Colbert can't even say what they are. If there were crimes in the report all the Trump haters like Colbert and the fake news media would have the "crimes" down to succinct descriptions by now. Do you know why they don't? Cause they don't have a damn thing except hatred for Trump.

  3. Colbert better stick to humor, he is rude interviewer and a ignoramus. His little echo chamber for lowball, crass humor is pathetic.

  4. A lot of you Liberals who simply hate Trump because he beat your precious Hillary need a serious reality check. You all will deny truth just because it doesn't fit into your agenda. If any of you had an open mind, and actually watched those hearings, you would conclude (if intellectually honest), that Mueller did NOT write that report. Mueller himself was questioned by Republicans, and at times, did not even know what was in the report! That old man didn't even know what Fusion GPS was!!!! A lot of you don't either because the mainstream media only tells you tidbits of info based upon their own agenda and not the truth. The person most likely that wrote that "Mueller" Report was Andrew Weissmann. How any of you can still be defending Robert Mueller as this noble public servant just shows your lack of reason, logic, common sense, honesty, integrity, and your disregard for The Constitution. Mueller tainted his own reputation by agreeing to using his name as the figure-head for this ridiculous report. The bottom line is that the Obama Administration used the power and authority of its intelligence apparatus (FBI & CIA) to spy on and to subvert Donald Trump's campaign. Hillary paid lots of money, for a crap-load of made up lies and fabrications about Donald Trump, and that phony information was used to ILLEGALLY spy on Carter Page and George Papadopoulos, thus violating their Constitutional right to privacy. All this bullshit was for the express purpose of undoing the 2016 election.

  5. Who started the investigation and why, also where is the underlying crime, Stephen?

    Stephen: have you and your Family been ever falsely accused then investigated by the entire world‘s investigators and intelligence Systems for 2 years while people curse and make fun of you?

    Stephen: you have misinformed and mislead your audience for 2 years, for which you‘re paid to insult and besmirch innocent people: you better go back to your priest to confess and ask for forgiveness!

  6. WALLACE.! I'm sitting here waiting in anticipation of your next post.. While Watching Your coverage of the shooting in El Paso. Lmao again Chris. Your Racist baiting knob gobblers ,you and Butthead..The Mayor wasn't enough to keep you from flinging crap.. 20 yr old ! Well organized.! White supremacists group.! WHERE.??? On video games.??? Really.???? This time Chris your not getting back up.!!!!

  7. Cobert – that's not what you saw I'll tell you what you saw. So a British MI5 agent and Russians putting together the Russian Dossier of lies for the DNC & Clinton is not foreign interference ???????????????????????? LMAO.

  8. I don't get people these days I could care less about Mullers delivery or his demeanor the point I got out of his testimony was Trump broke the law, he got help from the Russians, William Barr and Trump lied to all of us about that report and we at this very minute are still being attacked by Russia and any other country interested in screwing with us and a senate leader that won't let anyone pass a bill to stop this. 🤔 JUST SAYIN!

  9. Steve Colbert delivers the notion that Chris Wallace's points about the hearings being a disaster are only performance failures and therefore Wallace is out of order.

    Wallace shoots this notion down, with authority and clarity by pointing out that the hearings had nothing to offer over the existing Mueller Report "going in" …
    Therefore a horrible delivery by Mueller and nothing new is a disaster and failure.

    Chris Wallace said, If you have Mueller's report already, what else are you looking for other than a good, theatrical performance ?

    Complete silence ! Lol,..these people are pathetic.

  10. Fox is garbage but Chris Wallace is a pretty straight shooter. I'd like to see him on a network with Jake Tapper and Anderson Cooper

  11. Breaking news for dumbasses!! For those harping and hoping on the idea Trump will be prosecuted when he leaves office: The statue of limitations is 5 years, and he will be at 8 by then, lol. More obvious tho is that he wouldn't get successfully prosecuted any ways. Suck it up.

  12. Something new did come from Muellers testimony. Something that was NOT in the report. In the testimony, when Mueller was asked by a Republican, paraphrased, "Can Donald Trump be charged with criminal activity after he leaves office?" Mueller responded with an emphatic, "Yes." The Republican who asked the question seemed taken aback and asked the question again. Mueller responded again an emphatic yes.

  13. Two dopes having different stage on TDS. Colbert as always praising Putin for his ability to control the world of the international politics. Colbert is not funny and never was – he is just rude and self absorbed loudspeaker without volume control. He has less sense of humor than dead snake charmer

  14. Mueller did not write and did not read the report. Both actions were out of his purview. He just can't do it. He has an advanced dementia. Even such a crack-brained person like Colbert knows that

  15. The only what came out of Mueller's testimony is that he is brain dead. In 1986 he was appointed by Ronald Reagan as an Acting United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts. But he said during testimony that that was Bush who gave him this job. He probably forgot who Ronald Reagan was.

  16. How do the liberals go right by the fact that mueller never wrote the report never it was never about Russian tampering it was all about nailing trump

  17. It was sad. They took advantage of Mueller. They just put him "in charge" to put his name on the front of their work so it looked legit and held merit. He clearly didn't even know what was in his own report. I felt bad for him.

  18. He said, we knew what was in the report before the hearing….. tell that to your colleagues… they still think Trump was totally exonerated.

  19. As much as I live Stephen, I cannot disagree with Chris. I also think Stephen needed to stand down. He was giving Chris a hard time for not sharing his same view while Chris remained respectful.

  20. 7:15 do not welcome help tribe? hillary, obama , fusion Gps , the fake russian lawyer set up meeting paid for by hillary tribe? all those who lied, cheated , deleted emails and smashed black berries tribe? all walked free . im on the live by truths tribe , make sense out of nonsense tribe. tune into kevins corner , jon miller, mark dice etc and watch real americans make truthfull news .
    after that hillary report , i mean the fake prewritten by dems mueller report . everyone will be voting trump tribe . 2020 have a nice day , live by truths and truths are revealed

  21. In what way was it a disaster I don't understand. "Yes you do". HAAHA Yeah just got owned for being a propagandist liar. Priceless!

  22. Nobody's more compromised than these two people. It is sad that the audience is chemically lobotomized with psychiatric meds and heroin. Okay benefit of the doubt they ate a whole lot of toothpaste sandwiches.

  23. What about that time when Adam Schiff thought he was speaking to Russians about getting dirt on Trump? There's even a recording of it.

  24. Are you kidding Stephan Colbert, Russia voted here and Trump won. Good god dumbass, think about reality then comment.

  25. Muller under minded his own reputation. Stephen Colbert leads a choir of indoctrinated young people who hide in safe places so do not have to think out of the liberal box.

  26. "I am in the 'Do Not Welcome the Help of a Foreign Country to Win our Election' tribe. Those are my tribes". If that be the case Stephen, you should probably care that Robert Mueller did not understand what "Fusion GPS" was.

  27. Wallace is phony . He wants to maintain his social status amongst the Washington elites . He might not have like Trump ,no problem . He is not strait , not evenhanded and forgives or doesn't notice faults on Dems as much as on Reps .

  28. This is not an attack if there was nothing there and there still is nothing there because if there was something there guess what could’ve been impeached this is just another part of the travesty that has happened I hope next time a Democrat gets in there we harass him at the very start and just never never let up and settled like we did with Obama with his BlackBerry and his pen we should’ve took that away from him but we did not but I’m gonna tell you what if you don’t give this up it’s going to happen the next time

  29. D*ck face Chris Wallace is now spreading fake news like CNN and MSNBC. He used a fake data graph supplied by Gold Sachs, a China affiliated investment company to unfairly and viciously criticize Trump's tariffs on Chinese goods. Shame on D*ck face Chris Wallace!

  30. D*ck face Chris Wallace is now spreading fake news like CNN and MSNBC. He used a fake data graph supplied by Gold Sachs, a China affiliated investment company to unfairly and viciously criticize Trump's tariffs on Chinese goods. Shame on D*ck face Chris Wallace!

  31. So, you can't show clips of Chris Wallace taking apart the elite class… you have to show his dad doing it… like that somehow proves Chris Wallace is not a bought and paid for hack… Just like Stephen Colbert.

    Long fall from the Correspondence dinner highlight, huh Stevie?

  32. Seriously, if you want to watch an honest comedian actually criticize the government instead of knowingly pandering conspiracy theories for the Democratic Party in the throes of McCarthyism?

    Jimmy Dore.

  33. His failed joke about "Can you explain the lack of lipstick on your collar" was the REAL Disaster. Republicans are trying to bring us back to tribal times. This is called REGRESSION. DO REPUBLICANS WIPE THEIR ASSES WITH LEAVES TOO ?

  34. “Yes you do” Fact. Stephen Colbert spent the entire interview trying to silence Wallace. You only silence your opposition if you know your position is indefensible.

  35. I'm on the anti-FoxNews tribe. But, as usual, I think Chris Wallace made a lot of sense and handled himself pretty well here.

  36. Stephen Colbert did to Chris Wallace what Mike Wallace would've done to his own son back in his day. Chris doesn't "call balls and strikes." He makes a concerted effort to change the meaning of words and events in order to supply his "tribe" with favorable reporting.

  37. Nothing more frustrating than watching an Op Ed, so-called, "comedian" asking questions of a guest, and then never letting him answer any of them.
    This is an absolute perfect example of a real objective journalist versus an example of the majority of the MSM who couldn't be objective if their life depended on it.

  38. Trump didn't betrayed America he betrayed Hollywood and it so shows. Havey Weinstein their God movies their bible and talk shows their disciples

  39. Mike Wallace and Chris Wallace are NOT the same person!!!!!!!! Ie the black and white video at the beginning is not the person being interviewed. Why do they show a clip of the father to introduce the son??????

  40. I used to like watching Colbert when he was funny to help forget my troubles now he just pours salt into open wounds please try and be funny again 😢

  41. What a horrible interview. Taking cheap shots to kill his answer to the question, and then taking some sort of moral high-ground without letting him finish. What a dick move. If you want to talk to a Fox pundit cardboard-cutout, don’t invite a live one with a reasonable argument.

  42. He's wrong about the Mueller hearing.Before the when the report first came out people only relied on what their favorite "news" stations were saying it said.And with trump and Barr misrepresenting the report in the first place they were given bad information. But now with Mueller saying everything out loud they now have video clips that will keep running and be parts of ads and memes for awhile now. They will get miles and miles and miles out of it.

  43. Leftists. Always think they are right & think they have moral superiority in their utopia world. But on the fair same playing level field, they get destroy horribly because of reality.

  44. I have to agree with Chris on this one. It really was all about theater and not so much about the report. People who were sincerely interested in the report read at least some of it or spend a good amount of time listening to those who did read it. The answers were there 2 months ago. The hearing was just o try and get people to watch the report as opposed to reading it. Even someone like myself who has leaned democrat their entire life though the hearing was a flop. There was nothing new presented here and Mueller did at times look confused and completely done with the process. He just wanted to go home and read while we were over here calling him back to testify.

    I do believe the information in the report means something, but the hearing themselves? Yes, it was a flop. Nothing new came out of this except getting Mueller to rehash what he had already said in the report.

  45. A journalist doesn't "call balls and strikes", they simply report that a ball was called by the umpire. There is no judgement from a journalist. Most people in journalism today are NOT journalists. They share their opinion and report the facts that support their opinion as if to justify it or persuade others. That's a persuasive argument, not journalism. There is a time for that kind of journalism in an editorial or other opinion pieces but when those pieces make up 95% of the "journalism" you do, I don't see how you can claim to be a journalist.

  46. Mueller is not a politician and not a partisan hack. Therefore , he did not have to come across as combative and ready to bat away the rude insinuations against him that the Repulicans (his fellow party members) made. They did not want testimony, they wanted to debate. That is not his job.

  47. If ignorance is bliss, then Mueller and his protege Robert DUH Niro, and Colbert could tell us all what it is like to be in Paradise.

  48. Three weeks later and everyone has forgotten Mueller and the “russia thing” which proves Wallace’s point. Since then we’ve had “Trump is a racist and caused the mass shooting!”… and then it was clear one shooter was an antifa sympathizer. Then he was “caught up with Epstein” … except he wasn’t and Bill Clinton probably was. Oh now there’s a recession and all the anti-trumpers are rooting for it… but the Dow Jones is beginning to rebound now… Spiteful and anti-american leftists.

  49. Johnny Carson’s pinkie toe could do a better late night program than Colbert. What a charismatically dehydrated bore

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *