Articles Blog

Mueller Says Trump Wasn’t Exonerated, Could Be Charged After Leaving Office: A Closer Look

Mueller Says Trump Wasn’t Exonerated, Could Be Charged After Leaving Office: A Closer Look


-It was a busy day. Robert Mueller,
the former special counsel in the Russia investigation,
testified before Congress today. For more on this, it’s time
for “A Closer Look.” [ Cheers and applause ] Of course, Mueller’s testimony
was highly anticipated with lots of people
expected to watch, except one guy who claimed
he wouldn’t watch, a guy notorious
for watching more TV than is medically advisable, and that’s the president
of the United States. Trump said this week, he would not watch the testimony
because Democrats shouldn’t get to keep talking about
the Russia investigation. -Mr. President —
-One question. -No, I’m not going to be
watching, probably. Maybe I’ll see
a little bit of it. I’m not going to be
watching Mueller, because you can’t take all those bites
out of the apple. -Of course, Trump
thinks you can’t take all those bites out of the apple
because he’s never taken more than one bite
out of an apple, and that was a mistake. [ As Trump ]
“This meatball is disgusting.” [ Laughter ] [ Normal voice ] But it would
have been instructive for Trump to watch because he clearly
has not read the report. I mean, it’s over 400 pages. There’s no way Trump’s ever read anything that long
in his life. If he gets a fortune cookie
with his takeout, he hands it to one of his aides. [ As Trump ]
“Just give me the gist.” [ Normal voice ] In fact,
despite his obvious lie, Trump almost certainly
was watching the hearings because before
they even started, he predictably lost his mind
on Twitter again. All of these are
just from this morning. -“So, Democrats and others can
illegally fabricate a crime, try pinning it on
a very innocent president, and when he fights back
against this illegal, treasonous attack
on our country, they call it obstruction —
wrong! Why didn’t Robert Mueller
investigate the investigators?” -“Why didn’t Robert Mueller and his band
of 18 angry Democrats spend any time investigating
crooked Hillary Clinton, lying and leaking James Comey, Lisa Page and her psycho lover
Peter Strzok, Andy McCabe,
the beautiful Ohr family, Fusion GPS, and many more, including himself and Andrew W?” “So, why didn’t the highly-
conflicted Robert Mueller investigate how and why
crooked Hillary Clinton deleted and acid washed
33,000 e-mails immediately
after getting a subpoena from the United States Congress? She must have great lawyers.” -“No collusion. No obstruction.” -“The greatest witch hunt
in U.S. history, by far.” -Dear God, his tweets
would make more sense if they were scribbled on paper and faxed to a newspaper
under the zodiac symbol. But at the very least,
today’s hearings might have been informative, both for Trump
and for members of Congress who have admitted they didn’t
read the whole report. More than a dozen
members of Congress readily admitted to Politico that they, too,
have skipped around rather than studying every one of the special counsel
report’s 448 pages. That might explain why some Democrats have
spent the last few months trying to educate
their Republican colleagues by reading sections
of the report into the Congressional record, including sections of the report
that include colorful language which has given us fun clips
like these. -Page 78 of Volume 2
of the report says and I quote, “When Sessions
told the president that a special counsel
had been appointed, the president slumped back
in his chair and said, ‘Oh, my God.
This is terrible. This is the end
of my presidency. I’m [bleep].'” -On Saturday, June 17, 2017, the president called McGahn and told him to have
the special counsel removed. That evening, McGahn called
both Priebus and Bannon and told them that
he intended to resign. Priebus recalled that McGahn
said that the president had asked him to,
“Do crazy [bleep].” [ Laughter ] -It is both great and weird to hear a curse word
come out of Elizabeth Warren. It’s like watching a nun
take a hit off a joint. What they were reading
into the record were details from the report on Trump’s various attempts
to obstruct justice, including ordering his
former White House counsel Don McGahn to fire Mueller. But Trump has repeatedly
insisted falsely without offering any details that Article 2
of the Constitution, which is about
the executive branch, gives him the power
to fire Mueller and do whatever he wants. He’s repeated that argument
over and over, including during
a rambling speech yesterday. -Article 2 allows me
to do whatever I want. Article 2 would have
allowed me to fire him. Nobody ever mentions Article 2. It gives me all of these rights at a level that nobody
has ever seen before. We don’t even talk
about Article 2. Then I have an Article 2 where I have the right to do
whatever I want as president, but I don’t even
talk about that. [ Laughter ] -First, “I have an Article 2,” is such a New York way
of saying it. [ New York accent ] “It’s not
jaywalking when I do it because I got an Article 2
right here, buddy. Stop your honking.” [ Cheers and applause ] [ Normal voice ] Also… I like how he says,
“I don’t talk about that,” even though he constantly
talks about that. He’s like a grandparent
who won’t stop talking about how you won’t call. “I never hear from you,
not a phone call, not an e-mail,
not even a card, but still,
I don’t complain.” [ Laughter ] Also Article 2 does not
give you the right to do whatever you want. If that’s the case, it would have been
a lot shorter. [ Laughter ] This is why today’s hearing
was so important. The lawless president who openly
welcomed foreign interference and then tried
repeatedly to stop the investigation
of that interference thinks he can do
whatever he wants, which is why we need a Congress that will hold him accountable. Now you heard the president
in his tweets today and for the last few months, he was totally and completely exonerated
by the Mueller report, and since Donald Trump
is known as a truthful guy, I am sure once
the hearings began, Robert Mueller confirmed exactly
what the president said. -The president has repeatedly
claimed that your report found there was no obstruction and that it completely
and totally exonerated him. But that is not what
your report said, is it? -Correct. It is not
what the report said. -So, the report did not conclude that he did not commit
obstruction of justice? Is that correct? -That is correct. -And what about
total exoneration? Did you actually totally
exonerate the president? -No.
-What? But Trump scream tweeted, “no collusion, no obstruction.” It was in all caps, and if it’s in all caps,
you know it’s true, like when you get an e-mail
that says “free boner pills,” you know it’s legit. [ Laughter ] You’re not gonna pay
for those boner pills. [ Laughter ] Right off the bat,
this was the key exchange. We heard from the investigator,
himself, that his report did not
exonerate the president. In fact, there was at least
one very specific reason Mueller couldn’t just go ahead
and charge Trump with a crime, and it’s because of guidelines from the Justice Department’s
Office of Legal Counsel, or OLC, that say a sitting President
cannot be indicted, which Mueller confirmed today. The chairman of
the Judiciary Committee Jerry Nadler also asked Mueller about his attempts
to interview Trump which Trump refused
and revealed how long Mueller had tried to get Trump
to sit down for an interview. -Did the president refuse
the request to be interviewed by you or your team? -Yes.
-Yes? And is it true that you tried
for more than a year to secure an interview with the president?
-Yes. -Well, you didn’t go through
the proper channels. If you want Trump
to give you an answer, you either need
to go to Fox News or send him a rambling tweet that praises him in syntax
he’s familiar with. “Mr. Very Innocent President,
sir, we would love for you to sit down for a very
exonerating interview, sir, because you are the best
and most not guilty president, with the most innocence, sir,
and everyone says so, sir.” And then…
[ Cheers and applause ] And then after
the chairman’s first questions came time for the Republicans
to open up their questions with the ranking member
of the committee, Doug Collins,
who warned Mueller that he would try
to speak slowly and then immediately
rambled so quickly even Mueller
couldn’t follow him. -I’ll talk slowly.
It’s said that I talk fast. I will talk slowly. Your report states that
your investigative team included 19 lawyers
and approximately 40 FBI agents, and analysts and accountants. Are those numbers accurate? -Could you repeat
that, please? -Is it also true that you
issued over 2,800 subpoenas, executed nearly
500 search warrants, obtained more than 230 orders
for communication records and 50 pin registers. -That went
a little fast for me. -Dude, are you
a member of Congress or an auctioneer? He didn’t get
the answer he wanted, but he did sell three paintings
and a hog. Republicans also tried
to grill Mueller by criticizing him for specifically
stating in his report that Trump had not
been exonerated, but as usual, they devolved
into partisan name calling, when Republican congressman
called Democrats socialists and slammed Mueller
for how he handled the allegations against Trump. -Americans need to know this,
as they listen to Democrats and socialists on
the other side of the aisle, I agree with the chairman
this morning when he said Donald Trump
is not above the law. He’s not, but he damn sure shouldn’t be below the law, which is where Volume 2
of this report puts him. -No, I agree
because that isn’t a thing. [ Laughter ] Though if anyone
could be below the law, it’s Donald Trump. Trump looks up at the law the same way he looks up
at an eclipse. [ Laughter ] “Below The Law” sounds
like a straight-to-video Steven Seagal movie
starring Donald Trump. Now, compare that tirade, to the straightforward questions
of some of the Democrats, which produced matter-of-fact
yes-or-no answers. -An unsuccessful attempt to obstruct justice
is still a crime. Is that correct? -That is correct. -Does that mean
you have to investigate all of his conduct
to ascertain true motive? -No. -President Trump directed
White House Counsel Don McGahn to fire you. Isn’t that correct?
-True. -Damn,
this hearing was flying so fast it must have been impossible
for Trump to follow along. Remember, he’s used to Fox News where his favorite hosts
speak slowly and loudly in words he can understand. -Paul Ryan needs to step down
as Speaker of the House. -See, nice and slow
in a New York accent. Jeanine Pirro… Jeanine Pirro is like
Dora the Explorer if she’d grown up
on Long Island. [ Long Island accent ]
“Can you help Boots find the auto body shop? Good job. Molto bene!” [ Normal voice ]
This captured the fundamental weirdness
of the hearing. Mueller wants the report
to speak for itself, and that report is
incredibly damning on its own, which is why Mueller often responded with
simple yes-or-no answers. In fact, so much of this hearing
consisted of the Democrats reading excerpts of the report
to Mueller and having Mueller
confirm he did, indeed, write those excerpts. -On Page 77 of Volume 2, your report also stated, “In addition,
some witnesses said that Trump privately
sought information about future
WikiLeaks releases.” Is that correct?
-Correct. -The president engaged
in efforts, and I quote, “To encourage witnesses
not to cooperate with the investigation.” Is that right?
-That’s correct. -Didn’t the president say,
quote, and this is on page 116, “If he doesn’t write a letter, then maybe I’ll have
to get rid of him.” -Yes. -Yeah, he wrote it. That’s why this whole thing
was so weird. He already wrote down
everything he knows. It’s like if you called
in Ernest Hemingway to grill him about
one of his books. “Is it true that
one of the characters is an old man?” “Yes.” “And he is, in fact,
on the sea?” “That is correct.” Republicans, meanwhile, tried
to impugn Mueller’s credibility Like when Congressman
Louie Gohmert bizarrely asked Mueller if he was friends with former FBI director
James Comey who, of course, was fired by Trump after
Trump asked him for loyalty and told him to shut down
his investigation into former national security adviser
Michael Flynn. -You and James Comey
have been good friends, were good friends,
for many years. Correct?
-We were business associates. We both started off in
the Justice Department — -You were good friends. You can work together
and not be friends, But you and Comey were friends.
-We were friends. -Gohmert might just be jealous
that, unlike him, people have friends. “And this friend of yours, he’s someone you can
have lunch with, maybe catch a ball game, and when you’re going
through a rough patch in your personal life,
he’s there to lend an ear? Maybe your family and his family take a vacation together
once in a while? Well, that must be
very nice for you. Mr. Mueller, I have
one question for you. Will you be my friend?” -No. [ Laughter, applause ] -And then Gohmert went off on an unhinged rant
that went on for so long he eventually got cut off
by the chairman of the committee which led to a very curt
response from Mueller. -If somebody knows they did not conspire with anybody from Russia to effect the election, and they see the big
Justice Department with people that
hate that person coming after them, and then
a special counsel appointed who hires dozens or more people that hate that person, and he knows he’s innocent, he’s not corruptly acting in order to see
that justice is done. What he’s doing is not
obstructing justice. He is pursuing justice
and the fact that you… -Gentleman’s time —
-…ran it out two years means you perpetuated injustice.
-The gentleman’s time — -I take — I take your question.
-Gentleman’s time is expired. -The witness may
answer the question. -I take your question. [ Light laughter ] -Now, apparently “I take your question” is a pretty standard
legal response, but it sounded like some
Dowager-Countess-level shade. “I take your question. Now, if you don’t mind,
do [bleep] right off.” [ Laughter ] In particular, Republicans
seem focused on the fact that Mueller listed
possible instances of obstruction of justice and said he cannot
exonerate the president. Republicans basically argued
that it was unfair for Mueller to put that information
in the report if he could not
indict the president, even though the rule
specifically said he wasn’t allowed
to indict the president. But then one Republican
congressman accidentally got Mueller to offer
an extremely revealing answer on whether Trump could ever be charged with a crime
in the future. -Was there sufficient evidence
to convict President Trump or anyone else with
obstruction of justice? -Uh, we did not make
that calculation. -How could you not have
made the calculation? -Because the OLC Opinion — the OLC opinion,
Office of Legal Counsel, indicates that we cannot
indict a sitting president. -Okay, but the — Could you charge the president
with a crime after he left office?
-Yes. -You believe that
he committed — You could charge the president
of the United States with obstruction of justice
after he left office? -Yes. -Oh, those were very fast yeses. “And would you like to be there
the day he’s arrested?” “Yes.” [ Cheers and applause ]
That guy was a Republican. He was a Republican, who accidentally
got Robert Mueller to say on national television
that after Trump leaves office, he can be charged with a crime. You know when Trump heard that, he started pushing the sofa
in front of the door. [ As Trump ]
“You’ll never take me alive.” [ Normal voice ] The bottom line
from today’s hearings is the same as it’s always been. We just got to see it played out
live on TV. Russia interfered in
the election to help trump. Trump welcomed and encouraged
that help, and then he almost certainly
committed crimes to obstruct the investigation
of that help. Mueller couldn’t indict Trump so the only remedy
is impeachment. It’s up to Congress now. They’re the only ones
who can hold the president accountable for his… -Crazy [bleep].
[ Laughter ] -This has been “A Closer Look.” [ Cheers and applause ]

100 thoughts on “Mueller Says Trump Wasn’t Exonerated, Could Be Charged After Leaving Office: A Closer Look”

  1. Seth u are an actual American idiot a millionaire who makes his millions dissing the country he’s from,

  2. Gomer is a deranged person. He chews on furniture when people aren't looking and hides dead birds in ladies' shoes sometimes. D.A., J.D., NYC

  3. Mueller doesn't have the power to exonerate anyone. He looks to be a guy that needs to look at his Drivers License and use Google Maps in order to get home everyday.

  4. the russian/republican party are dicks,UNAMERICAN DICKS.asshole disrespect a war hero something trump could never be.trump a traitor oh yes he is.

  5. This joker did not watch either or he is lying or did he not hear the part about a prosecutor cannot exonerate, not even a court does that.

  6. Only is Trump does not win in 2020. But if he Wins.
    The statute of limitations for this is 5 Years. He could not be charged.

  7. 8:17 Missed opportunity to play a clip of that time Congressman Billy Long shut down a protester in a hearing by summoning his auctioneer past and firing off auction numbers until she was escorted out of the room. (Yes, this happened. Look up "Billy Long auctioneer")

  8. Y'know, I hate Trump as much as anyone, but the whole 'Russiagate' thing makes me tune out because it's absolute bullshit. HRC destroyed evidence (which is also obstruction of justice) and the NSA couldn't confirm how the information was obtained, but I think they would have been able to if it was transferred over the net, yeah? And the FBI only got a redacted report from Crowdstrike, so they couldn't confirm anything either. It's a lie and you're either getting snowed or you're playing along for your own reasons…so you're either incompetent or disingenuous…either way, this is why a lot of people are getting disgusted with mainstream media. Even if we're not Trump supporters.

  9. No matter which side of the debate we are on, one thing's for sure, Robert Mueller has a nice smile. 7:54

  10. So, if Trump can be charged after he leaves office, why don't the Democrats hold off on Impeachment and during the 2020 campaign just smile and say "You're going to jail, you're going to jail." Surely that would make his head explode during the debates. Proper trolling!

  11. Mueller didnt have the authority to exonerate! The left are fueled by such hatred for the Presdent that they are consumed with it, makes them UGLY AS HELL!

  12. Yet stupid ass Pelosi doesn't want to impeach. This government is a joke. Checks and balances only matter if you use them!

  13. This is what makes this next election even more important, and even scarier. I’m mot looking forward to what he’ll do if he loses. He knows the only thing protecting him is the office and position that he currently holds. I can only imagine the drastic measures he will take in order to stay in office.

  14. Rod Rosenstein, Acting A.G. signed a document stating that a special council could indeed indict a sitting president, which nullifies the DOJ memo.

  15. There is no legal term of "exonerated" you are either guilty or not guilty according to evidence or lack of it. If you are going to make a video about a subject then maybe know a little something about it first. You fuckin muppet.

  16. Who said we won cold war, Russia has been laying in wait, looking for the opportunity to bring down the one of the leading democracies of the world. No bombs needed to bring down this Eagle, they continue to discredit democracies all over the world, they seem to be succeeding, perhaps a lack of leadership from USA

  17. And the more he shows his true self, is the more he shows himself to share the true hearts and values of the white Christians how have declared a special national day of prayer to glorify their New Messiah. They voted for him because he is "one of them" and "tells it like it is". And he is indeed one of them in all their hate, bigotry, misogyny, ignorance. And he does indeed "tell it like it is": America is racist and despite any kind of veneer of tolerance there is the ugly racist underbelly just waiting for the right savior to allow it to come out in the open like roaches.

    And if you people who call yourselves Christian don't like being called to account, then you shouldn't have voted for him. You shouldn't have voted for abti-LGBTQ bigots, and racists like Steve King and Mike Lee. You shouldn't have voted for misogynists who want to deny women autonomy and subjugate them because you big book of hate says so.

  18. It seems members of the GOP are more interested in protecting Trump and their own party, than the people of The United States.

  19. Is anyone going to address his claims that no one has ever seen the 200 year old document that is the basis for our whole government?

  20. Lol, when Trumpo loses next year and must hand over the office to the next elected president he will call in sick and take the next flight out of the country to his home country of Russia.

  21. I get confused with the logic, see whether I can get this correctly. Muller cited he cannot charge the president because of DOJ guideline, then after all the investigations, he said he cannot exonerate the president. So put this logically, if Mueller started on the ground that he can charge the president without any restriction, and he found the evidence that he definitely there is ground to charge, then he will definitely recommend charging the president. My logic is right? I get confused.

  22. The first rule of Article 2 is: You do not talk about Article 2. The second rule of Article 2 is: You do not talk about Article 2. Third rule of Article 2: Someone yells "Stop!", goes limp, taps out, the article is over. Fourth rule: Only two guys to a Article 2.

  23. Trump always sounds like he is slurring his words. He doesn't drink so it seem,s like benzo;s may be a possibility. He shows signs of extreme anxiety,

  24. I have to give this miraculous testimony, which is so unbelievable
    until now. I had a problem with my wife 2years ago, which lead to our
    break up. when she broke up with me, I was not myself again, i felt so
    empty inside me, my love and financial situation became worst, until a
    close friend of mine Desmond told me about a spell caster who helped
    him in the same problem too his name is Dr.idigun. I email Dr.idigun
    the spell caster and i told him my problem and i did what he asked of
    me, to cut the long story short. Before i knew what was happening my
    wife gave me a call and told me that he was coming back to me in just
    2days and was so happy to have her back to me. We have two kids
    together and we are happy with ourselves. Thanks to Dr.idigun for
    saving my relationship and for also saving others own too. continue
    your good work, If you are interested to contact him and testify this
    blessings like me, the great spell caster email address is
    [email protected]

  25. Trump has grasped The Senate leader, has stacked the supreme court, other judicial lifetime appointees, so gone is the Legislation, gone is the judicial, gone will be the Democracy. What will the people do?

  26. This was very nicely done. Seth explains things so much better than most of the news anchors on the USA news channels – like MSNBC and CNN. Fox News is nothing but a gossip channel IMO.

  27. Canadian here but I've followed American politics closely for a long time its my Soap Opera. I told all my friends in 2016 that Trump had a legit shot and got laughed at. I didn''t want to him to win but just as I read it Hillary ran a horrible campaign.

    Just gonna put these links here. This whole investigation is political theatre from both sides but it will backfire on the democrats in 2020 despite the bubble all you commentators seem to be living in Trump is polling stronger than ever (I'm not a trump supporter just objectively telling it like it is). I think that Bernie has a shot if the Democrats can pull themselves together behind him though I'm not holding my breath. I also like Warren but not sure she would get the support as much as Bernie they'll probably nominate a corporate friendly hack like Kamela Harris because she loves to grandstand. Please note the people in the video links, Jimmy Dore (a comedian with a podcast) and Aaron Mate (independent Journalist), are not Trump supporters they just have challenged the russiagate narrative from day one. Jimmy is a very progressive guy who was/is a huge Bernie Supporter and has had alot of push back on the immigration issues. Aaron Mate won an independant journalism award for his coverage of the this story https://www.democracynow.org/2019/4/3/headlines/2019_izzy_awards_honor_earth_island_journal_laura_flanders_aaron_mate_dave_lindorff

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOQXOV0PHL4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJQzkAORNc4

  28. WTF is below the law any way? I mean come on! But Im sure it was understood by trump supporters! LMAO at these idiots!

  29. WE need to hear from actual witnesses like Don McGahn, Annie Donaldson, Stephen Miller, Steve Bannon, Hope Hicks, Jared Kushner and Ivanka, And Don Junior…the people that were actually there! Call the witnesses to testify under oath, the people deserve to hear from them directly!

  30. A slimy, abject failure as President. Introducing his family into the Whitehouse and nobody has the slightest clue as to what purpose they serve, or role they perform. The U.S has self fucked itself. The likelihood of anyone taking the U.S seriously for decades to come is remote.

  31. We got him this time. We know that it is a jury that can find you not guilty, but if he was not exonerated well then there we go. He cant escape. Again.

  32. no one can be "Exonerated" in the US justice system, that is why mueller used that word, he knew the retards like talk show hosts and their audience would think that would mean trump was not innocent lol US citizens are so retarded, so easy to trigger and brainwash, weird hitler did not infiltrate USA more than he did before the spies were discovered, but maybe people were more intelligent back then….exonerated hahaha no judge can exonerate anyone

  33. Dems and their followers are just stuck on stupid with the use of exonerate, no prosecutor in any office in the country, in the history of the country can exonerate. It is the basis of jurisprudence in this country, a prosecutor can do many things, but exonerating anyone is not one of them.

  34. Fox news showing their stupidity. Surprise Surprise….
    F*ck Fox News!!!!! You lazy fing reporters!!!! Hi Elizabeth Warren.

  35. I trust this narrative because Seth Meyers and his investigative team say so, yeah right. Let's just take the most clips of anything sounding remotely bad for the POTUS and spin the narrative just enough for the folks who don't like POTUS and get a laugh and clap sign for the audience…. yeah, that should be enough for the public to agree with the libs and other radical dems. Wake up people, the current POTUS may not be the man you want in office but he sure is better than what the media portray him out to be

  36. Trump is a criminal and a traitor to our country. Saying he is "lawless" is a soft, vague way to state this. Call it what it is. Trump is a lot worse things than this, but he is at least this.

  37. Trump is either really stupid or thinks that his supporters or Americans in general are really stupid or don't really care enough to see through his daily shameless lies .

  38. Mueller is the last of the deep state puppet "obstructionists" and he FAILED MISERABLY. What a waste!!!!! The House is now a weaponized opposition think tank who have SOLD AMERICA OUT and are not 'legislating' at all. Losers.

  39. Seth has become part of the racist, evil Democratic Party that threatens the decent people of America. They must be stopped at all costs. They are racist, evil, divisive and have reached a point of being dangerous.

  40. You know, Myers, one of these days, PETA's going to have you arrested for continuing to kick a dead horse. Your boy Mueller failed. Hillary lost 2016. Get over it. It's time to quit the diapers and use a toilet like a big boy.

  41. Kind of a set up question, Their job was not to Prosecute or Exonerate. Their job was research. However Muller says nothing was found on Trump. Remind me not to go into politics and learn the art of word manipulation.

  42. I can't believe that I prefer Myers over Colbert. The writing here is always on point, funny and even informative.

  43. Hillary,and Obama. Are the real lowlife criminals here..starting false alligations.they used Mueller like a puppet…he didnt read,or write the report. It was the deep state…

  44. No matter what logic and reason we can give, throw, or even catapult at Trump supporters they will just look at you with that stupid look on their face and say "FAKE NEWS". This is effectively the death of the GOP. Welcome to the idiocracy folks. Trump will probably win in 2020 behind theses idiots.

  45. But he actually does exonerate Trump.. He just doesn't say it.. You are innocent until PROVEN guilty.. so when he said he did not prove the President was guilty, inversely he is presumed innocent and thus exonerated. Of course you claim that Muller didn't prove Trumps Guilt because of the OLC decision, but then Muller does say later in the Intelligence Hearing that That is not True, he did not charge Trump with Obstruction because they didn't and it wasn't because of the OLC.. Which means he is still presumed Innocent and therefore there is nothing for him to be exonerated from. There is no process of exoneration in this country, the only meaning exoneration has in this country is that you were not proven guilty and therefore you default to innocent and are exonerated.

  46. Yup. Because that's what prosecutors do…exonerate people. It's right there in their job desc….er…oh. Wait. IT'S THE EXACT OPPOSITE. :rolleseyes:

    What I'd like to know, is if Seth Meyers has been exonerated of all the child porn evidence. (no, I don't have the evidence, but I "heard it was out there"…and because someone said it and someone paid someone else to find the evidence they knew was there, well, it MUST be true, right? Don't bother looking into me or the people saying it, and definitely don't bother with finding the guy we…I mean "somebody" paid and ask him anything…total waste of time that could be spent trying to 'get to the truth'). <—Please Note that was all satirical and trying to make a point.

    One more time: MUELLER'S JOB WAS NOT TO EXONERATE ANYONE. Please, for the love of Dog, go read the report yourself. Then make your own decisions. But make sure you learn what you don't understand (re: words and law stuff).

  47. I know I'm a wee bit late posting this, but WHY DOES DAS ORANGE ANUS HATE JAMES COMEY? I mean, the ONLY reason it won The Electoral College was Comey announcing to the World that "he" was reopening "his" investigation into HRC's use of a private email server for official business.

    How STUPID is this "man"?

  48. Mull this over America… If you re-elect Trump he will most certainly put one, and possibly two, more Supreme Court Justice on the bench. Food for thought… If we were playing spades that's three and a possible.

    Grand Overlord Trump is becoming more and more a reality.

  49. Mueller has no jurisdiction saying anyone's exonerated. There was no Russian interference or collusion is what the report says and Mueller as well. As far as exoneration from mueller is like asking a gynecologist to be your dentist lol.

  50. I take your question really does sound like a badass insult lmao like I take your question and I am gonna swipe my ass with it, thank you

  51. OMG! Did I just see uncensored middle fingers on a US network TV show?! Finally! America has caught up with the rest of western civilisation!

  52. Jesus. Give it up already. Corporate Clintonite Democrats sold their gullible dog and pony show on russian interference to distract people from the fact that their candidate was so hated by the american people that they prefered a raving orange lunatic instead. But dems being dems, they will believe anything that placates their guilty liberal conscience.

  53. Lol, below the law is what we are all supposed to be. "Eye level" is nonsensical gibberish. Those who act above it are criminals. Those who are above it are tyrants.

  54. In the interests of world peace cant his Twitter account be closed ? Can he not be sent for psychological evaluation . My mother was paranoid schizophrenic and Trumps ramblings remind me of her when she was off her meds ….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *